Archive for March, 2010

Marie Force Interviews Editor Jessica Schulte

I first “met” my new Carina editor, Jessica Schulte, in February when she emailed to request some revisions to my book Fatal Affair. Since the book was acquired later in February, we’ve worked together on revisions and line edits and had a good time getting to know each other. She is a treat to work with and has a great sense of humor. Well, after you read our interview, you won’t need me to tell you that!

Marie: Tell me about your career in publishing and how you came to be involved with Carina Press.

Jessica: I came to publishing after getting my master’s degree in dramatic criticism from Columbia University. I love how theatre tells stories so directly–it’s a connection, I think to oral story telling. It just resonates on a very primal level. What I loved about studying dramatic literature and writing about productions, was that it allowed me to really investigate the craft and understand why and how plays worked (or didn’t!) LOL! Of course, with plays there are other elements that affect the overall outcome and effect, i.e. lighting, sets, costumes, direction and acting. There are so many variables in theatre; it’s very exciting and it’s why one production is never like another.

But with books it’s just the author and the reader. It’s very intimate and immediate storytelling, a partnership almost. And the

Marie:
I know you’re somewhat new to the romance genre, so what is the most interesting thing you’ve learned about romance since joining Carina?

Jessica: Oh, boy. I think a good editor, (and a good writer) is always learning—but I just love the story telling in romance novels. I love the twists and turns, and uh, well, the romance. I’m also thrilled by how eagerly romance readers have adopted the digital medium. I am really enjoying exploring websites and forums where readers and writers passionately hold forth. I adore smartbitches.com (and their book, Beyond Heaving Bosoms), as someone new to the genre they let me know that a wicked sense of humor was a good thing to bring to the genre.

Marie: We’ve had some fun while editing my book, Fatal Affair. You confessed to me that you might be slightly (okay totally, but this is a family show) in love with my hero Nick… What do you love about Nick and what makes you fall in love with a hero?

Jessica: Ohhhh! I really do love Nick.He has real heart.He’s devastated by what’s happened but he’s still so open to the possibilities around him. And he’s not afraid to make a fool of himself or to apologize. And he’s a terrific lover. He’s so much like my husband, that I just can’t resist him. (Hi, honey!!)

I think I fall in love a little bit with all the characters in books that I edit. Even the bad guys. When a book works you just fall in to that world and you love being there with everyone.

Marie: I’m SO glad you love Nick, and I adore your reasons! Hopefully, readers will fall in love with him, too! Next questions: What’s your favorite book? Movie? TV show? And, since you live in New York City, Broadway show?

Jessica: This is one of my worst subjects. Ever. I I can’t pick a favorite color, either. Oh, sheesh. I just can’t pick. I can’t. Please don’t make me. I have a special place for YA and middle grade novels and am loving Rhonda Stapleton’s Stupid Cupid right now. It’s so fun!!  But I also love Kathi Appelt’s The Underneath, and Suzanne Collins The Hunger Games series. They are fun, too, but in a completely different way. I have a real weakness for Rogers and Hammerstein, Rodgers and Hart, Lerner and Lowe, and Sondheim musicals. It is a great sorrow to me that I can’t sing. And since I worked on The Secret Garden, that show has a very special place in my heart.

As for TV, full disclosure: I still miss The Gilmore Girls and am THRILLED that Lauren Graham is back on weekly TV. There, I’ve said it.

Marie: I’ve discovered there’s a 14-year-old girl lurking inside you! How do you like to spend your free time?

Jessica: Oh, there’s definitely a 14-year old girl lurking not that secretly inside me. When I was a kid, I really wanted to be  Dr. Dolittle, and so I spent my time surrounded by as many animals as my parents would allow. And now that I’m supposed to be a grown up and live in an apartment, I can’t have as many animals as I wish, but I am also a dog trainer so I get to work with dogs and their people and compete with my dog in agility, competition obedience, and Rally-O. We’re also learning Freestyle. If you’re interested in what that is, check out http://tinyurl.com/3danad I promise, you won’t be sorry.

And yes, musical theatre alert!I also knit and make jewelry when I am just hanging out watching TV.

Marie: What makes a submission stand out to you?

Jessica: I am looking for stories that suck me in and don’t let me go. I love when the heroine is struggling with issues and the answers come after some real deep soul-searching. And I love to laugh. So if those things are combined I am in heaven. I love historical romances when I am taken to new worlds (even if it’s a familiar period) and learn new things. And I love stories where characters have a bond with pets, especially dogs.

Thanks to Jessica for answering my questions! It was fun to get to know her better!

You can follow Jessica on Twitter

Angela’s note: Feel free to ask Jessica questions in the comments and we’ll get her to come by and answer them!

Week 20… I finally did it

Yep, I finally did it. There have been weeks where I’ve *almost* done it but this week was the first week I managed to forget to make the weekly Monday post. Did anyone wonder where it was? Come on, now, admit it, you’ve been hitting refresh waiting for this post. No? Okay then…

Moving on to our week in review, you’d think last week was actually last year for as much detail as I can recall about it. I’ve been going over final book files before we send them to production, reviewing the files and reading a few of the books here and there. Making editors and authors cry (kidding!) Our first batch of books will be going to production for formatting on April 6th. You know what this means?

We’re launching in June!

I know, you already knew that. I asked about sharing the launch date but we’re holding off, just in case something goes wrong (I’m thinking that maybe if I get hit by a car tomorrow, that would be a problem and might put a hiccup in the launch?) But we are planning some activities for here on the blog, for leading up to launch, so you’ll discover the actual launch date in a few weeks!

In the meantime, it’s really business as usual in the world of Carina. We’re working to meet deadlines, read submissions, get cover art and cover copy finalized and just complete the total book package. I can’t wait to see the first books all done.

I do have something new for you here on the blog, though. Starting this week and for the next several weeks, we’ll be sharing interviews with the Carina Press freelance editorial team. Since I’m working on delegating, I turned this task over to the authors and asked them to conduct an interview with their editor and blog about it. The first one will go live on Thursday!

And, of course, there’s still more great cover art and back cover copy to come. I can’t believe that it’s already April and we’re going to launch in just two months!

The Bloodgate Guardian by Joely Sue Burkhart

How would you like to see a combination of cover art and cover copy to end the work week? This is pre-copy editor cover copy, but I wanted to give you a sneak peek!

Photobucket The Bloodgate Guardian
By Joely Sue Burkhart
Fantasy w/strong romantic elements

Worlds within worlds await through the Maya Bloodgate….

Dr. Jaid Merritt doesn’t do digs. The last time she ventured into the jungle, someone died. Now she’s content to decipher Maya glyphs from pictures sent to her by her famous archaeologist father. But when he goes missing while trying to perform a ritual based on her translations of an ancient codex, Jaid must put aside her fears and travel to Guatemala to find him.

After misusing the Bloodgates to bring his twin brother back from the afterlife, the Maya priest known as Ruin was cursed by the gods to stand as the guardian for all time. He was unable to stop Dr. Charles Merritt from opening the gates, and now demons roam this world. The last thing he wants to do is hurt the beautiful woman who is somehow infused with his magic, but if she uses the codex to retrieve her father, Ruin must do his duty. And this time, he won’t fail. Even if it kills him. Again.

Author vs. Author: Name that hero!

Please welcome authors Ginny Glass and Inez Kelley to the Carina blog. Ginny and Inez each have signed a book with Carina Press individually, for release in June, as well as their co-authored book TALK DIRTY TO ME, coming Summer 2010.

HELP US FIND THE “J” SPOT!!

GIN SAYS:

Hello Carina readers!  We need your help!

The lovely Inez Kelley and I have recently contracted a co-written story called “Talk Dirty To Me” to Carina Press. It is scheduled for a release in Summer 2010 as part of the Dirty Laundry series. It’s a smart, sexy read that features an equally smart and sexy hero – an English Professor with a penchant for assuming mysterious identities and dirty talk. He’s quite dreamy.

The only problem is, we don’t have a name for him.

Ok, so we do have a name for him, but it just doesn’t ring the right note, so we’re changing it. That’s where we need your help. Inez insists on one name, and I am pining for another. We decided to put it out to the potential readers of the book and see what y’all think!

Here’s a preliminary blurb for “Talk Dirty to Me” to get you up to speed:

“Tell me what you want. Talk dirty to me.”

Scientist Nora MacGregor is frantic when she loses the book containing her dissertation notes—and some very personal fantasies. Then a sinful stranger calls with a wicked proposition: if she talks dirty to him, he’ll return her notes, page by page. “James” allows Nora to explore her deepest desires and challenges her clinical ideas about sex. But James can’t give her the loving touches she finds in her budding relationship with Dr. Jackson Reed.

Jackson seized an opportune moment to fulfill his desire for Nora by becoming the mysterious James. While the anonymous, erotic phone sessions are unforgettable, Jackson longs to tell Nora he wants more than just talk. But how can he confess his deception without it costing him the chance to make their fantasies a reality?

I’m throwing my hat in the ring for the name “Jackson” – it just sounds sexy – enough of a soft little ess-sound in the middle to hiss or moan. Whooo!

Now Inez is going to try to convince you that he should be named Percy or Brick or Ravenwood. Don’t listen to her. Stick here with me and when Jackson wins out, I will host a contest to give away some goodies when release date nears!

In the meantime, why don’t you nab this handy dandy graphic to display on your blog, website, etc.?

Photobucket

TEAM JACKSON!

~~~~~~~~
INEZ SAYS:

Percy? Brick? Oh hell no. It is SOOOO on now, chickie!

Notice how Ginny posted the preliminary blurb with JACKSON already in place? Sneaky little tramp, ain’t she? And she is bribing you all to vote. That should be illegal or something. *smack*

We originally named the character Jasper. Mild-mannered, unassuming and completely stuffy sounding but yeah, okay, maybe too much. Now we are on the search for a new J name. It has to be a ‘J’ name because… well, you will just have to read it to discover WHY that is so important.

An entire page of ‘J’ names were discussed and discarded. Ginny Glass and I do work well together, usually agreeing on everything down to the comma placement but this… this we are ready to Jell-O wrestle over!

“JARED”

Dr. Jared Reed has a wonderful sound. The rolling Rs fit well on your tongue and it is easy to imagine screaming “JARED” in the heat of the moment. It is tough without being alphahole and soft without being wimpy. And any man that uses only his voice to bring a woman to climax deserves a helluva good name.

Besides, this man is just so damn yummy, you want to eat him with a spoon and lick the bowl!

So join me in choosing TEAM JARED and vote!

Photobucket

**please note that the blog is sending all comments direct to spam for some reason. I’m fishing them out as quickly as I can, but there might be a delay when I’m not at the computer. The problem isn’t on your end, it’s on ours!**

Week 19…production schedules are scary

You almost got quite a unique post yesterday. See, the link to this blog’s admin page is right next to the link for a cooking/craft blog I post on during the week. On Sundays, I post a weekly menu post and somehow, I wrote that post on THIS blog. The only thing that stopped me from publishing it was that I went looking for the picture that goes with that post every week and instead I found…cover art. Ha! But I’ll bet some of you would have been okay with a weekly menu post!

Anyway, last week was one of those weeks where you just know you’re not going to get everything done (okay, okay, all my weeks are like that right now, can you relate?) but I focused on two things that were of immediate importance: our production schedule and submissions.

First, the production schedule. See, we do have a plan for launch. Even though we’re not sharing a lot of public details about it yet, or giving a specific June date for launch, we do have a plan. But before we commit publically to our plan, we have to know that we’re going to be able to deliver. And that means weekly meetings about the production schedule. And in the case of last week? Two meetings. Can we meet editorial and production deadlines? Can we get the material we need, get the books finalized, get our eyes on them and get them to be formatted by the deadline? These are the questions that came down to the wire last week, and I spent a lot of time emailing with the editors, getting answers on projected dates and return times and figuring out: can it be done because this is it.

The ultimate answer is: holy cow are the freelance editors we’re using amazing! Seriously, utterly amazing. They’re busting it double time to get things done so we can meet all deadlines and follow through on our grand plan. And not a few of the copy editors have also said, “yes, I can get this done sooner”. They all rock, I’m lucky to have gathered such a great group of professionals. So yep, much to my relief (no really, you don’t know how relieved) it looks like we’re going to do it. In a few weeks, we’ll be ready to announce more specific details of launch and gear up for June. Whee!

Second, submissions. I want to start out submissions by mentioning that I hired another editor last week because we have such amazing submissions rolling in, I needed another person to help us start going through them and taking on the task of guiding them through edits. I’m happy to welcome Charlotte Herscher, who has extensive editing background in traditional pub settings. You’ll get to learn more about Charlotte, and the other editors, in the coming weeks as we start editor interviews!

Anyway, submissions got a massive update Thursday and Friday, and if you missed it, here’s the post with that update. I’d love to do a more detailed post about genres we’re seeing (and the most common words used in titles, just for giggles) but that’s going to have to wait a bit. I will say that we’re seeing a good bit of historical coming through, which I think is probably thanks to the targeting we did for them. Now it’s time to to start talking about the next genre we want to focus on!

Also last week, we sent out prelim cover copy to authors and editors, and got their feedback. After it has a visit with the copy editor, we’ll be able to share that with you. Anyone interested in seeing a few more covers? I have some I could share this week.

Stay tuned tomorrow: two authors need your help. Two authors, one hero. What should his name be? You help settle the feud!

March submissions update

I know I still owe you a query wrap-up and the checklist, but I’ve spent the last two days going through updates from the editors and sending out about a bazillion rejection letters so the wrap-up will come next week. Okay, not a bazillion, thank goodness, but it looks like the final total of rejections sent was almost 180. Now, keep in mind, each submission we get consists of query/intro letter, synopsis and full manuscript. We read anywhere from a page or two (yes, sometimes you can tell from that) to three chapters to the entire book prior to rejecting. Sometimes it gets read by more than one editor/team member prior to rejection. The editors send at least a line or two about every book they recommend for rejection. Occasionally, I will read a rejection report and ask if the manuscript should be viewed by another editor, or maybe receive a revision request. As I read every report, I determine if there is any feedback in the report that I can pass on to the author. Despite the fact that we do form rejections, perhaps 20% of the people who received rejections these past two days did receive some sort of personal feedback. As I said in this post, that makes the process a lot more lengthy (two days of lengthy), and I did consider simply sending form rejections to everyone, because my time is really (really) limited right now, but guilt got the better of me because I always hope that the authors who get the personal feedback find it helpful and utilize it. Also, I can empathize with the frustration of never knowing WHY. As one author responded to me (paraphrased) “I’ve been beating my head against a wall, submitting and getting rejected and just wondering why but never knowing. Now I know, thank you!” I always hope that the feedback will provide some sort of “aha!” moment.

And on that note…all submissions received before before February 3rd have either received a response or some form of correspondence from Carina. Some of those submissions had a long wait, and I apologize for that. We’re back within a 12-week response time again. If you submitted in November-January and haven’t heard from us at some point along the way, please send a follow-up email to submissions@carinapress.com

Now for some statistics (these are rough estimates so don’t try to make the numbers add up exactly, you’ll hurt your brain )

Total submissions to date: 770

Rejected: 550

Acquired: 47

Revise and Resubmit letters sent: Somewhere around 35+

Active submissions (being read by editors or awaiting read): 150

Currently with acquisitions team for review and possible acquisition: 7 manuscripts

% of submissions acquired: 8% (slightly weighted due to direct submissions from current authors or authors we’ve worked with before. Slush acquisitions percentage is around 5%)

In the next few weeks I want to try to work up a post to share some other random statistics with you like genre, length and more info on revise/resubmit (returns/acquisitions based on returns). But in the meantime, I’ve been living submissions for two days and I still have just a wee bit more to go, so I’ll let this submission update stand until the next one!

Thinking about Query Letters. Part II: Query Do’s

Following up on yesterday’s post about Query Don’ts, here’s some Query Do’s. I think these are probably common sense for most of you, but just in case!

Do

1. Read the submission guidelines

Just like I said as the last one of the query don’ts: friends don’t let friends send queries without first reading the submission guidelines. You wouldn’t go to a business interview without looking up the address, don’t query without looking up the guidelines. The person you’re querying has tried to give you the tools to do your job with those guidelines! Think of writing as your business (even if it’s just your hobby, it’s OUR business so treat it as yours too) and querying as your job interview.

2. Spell check

Let’s talk about spell check. I know it doesn’t catch every typo or misused word, but that’s no reason NOT to use it at all. In fact, most email programs have a setting that automatically spell checks your email before it goes out. You should use this setting, not just for query letters, but for all correspondence. Think of it as an “appearance” thing. We can’t see if you’ve got on your best business suit so instead, our first impression comes from the query letter and even more immediate? The subject line. You would be utterly shocked, I think, at how many queries come through with typos in the subject line. Yeah, we notice.

3. Include the important information

Make sure you tell us what we need to know: Your name (pen name and real name), title, genre, word count, is it complete and a short bit of info about the book. Then consider your published writing credits, major contest wins, major bestseller lists, membership to writer’s organizations or, if you’re writing non-fiction, your platform and relationship to the material.If you’ve been building an audience pre-publication with a website, blog, Twitter, Facebook or other social media site, you can mention that as well (though MySpace is considered old news now, so you might not want to hang that out as your only means of social media platform!)

Include whether the query has been previously published (or available for free giveaway even) and if it is a simultaneous submission (have you submitted it to other agents and publishers in the meantime), keeping in mind that some submissions guidelines at some publishers prohibit simultaneous submissions.

And hey! Don’t forget to include your phone number and address so we can get back to you. Kind of important and people DO miss this step!

4. Let the recipient know you’re paying attention

It’s one thing to say: I read your submission guidelines and here’s my submission. That’s good, we’re glad you’re paying attention. But what’s one of the rules of writing? Show, don’t tell. If you read our submission guidelines, show us by actually following them now that you’ve told us. You can also let the recipient know you’re paying attention by mentioning you read their blog, Twitter, etc.

As an example: we’ve had some queries come into the submissions box in the past few weeks addressed to a specific editor and mentioning that they saw that particular editor was interested in XYZ genre, after this post we did. Now we know that author has been paying attention!

5. Let the recipient know they’re special

This goes with #4, but it’s a little different. Yesterday I talked about not just copying and pasting your query letter, and this is one way in which you can let the editor/agent know it’s being written just for them. Not only do you let them know you’re paying attention, as in #4, but you can take it a step further. You can mention that you saw the editor/agent talk at a particular conference. If you met, maybe you can reference something unique about your conversation (we meet a lot of people, so help jog our memory!) But you can also reference that you’ve read one of the books they publish/represent and why it attracted you to that publisher/agent, or what you particularly enjoy about their blog or Twitter. Of course, there can be a fine line between sucking up and making the recipient feel special, so don’t go overboard.

Example: I occasionally get query letters that reference the author reads my personal blog or personal Twitter stream, and they go on to say what particularly they like about it (for instance, they like that I share recipes, talk about my daughter–and they’ll name her by name–or that they’re also interested in sewing).

6. Be gracious

This is twofold. First, be gracious in your query letter. Don’t talk about all the “crap that’s being published” or even worse, target books or authors specifically saying, “I know I can write better than them.” While we don’t expect you think everything that’s published is a special snowflake, we also don’t really expect you to introduce yourself and your book to us by putting down and insulting others. And, you know, since we’re part of the publishing industry, you’re basically telling us we’re responsible for putting out crap. That’s not the best way to start a potential working relationship!

The second part of this is if you get a rejection. Be gracious. Send a thank you or don’t (that’s a whole other debate) but don’t send a response telling the editor/agent that they obviously have terrible taste, a terrible eye for talent and don’t know how to do their job. Oh rly? In that case, why did you submit to us? I mean, you DID do research before submitting to us, right, so you know what our list looks like and how we operate?Anyway, why is this a bad idea? Because one rejection doesn’t mean you’ll never work with that person, there are a lot of authors who get rejected on one, two or even five projects from one editor/agent but end up hitting it just right with the sixth. And even if you decide you don’t want to work with us now, publishing is an ever changing business, six months from now that editor you insulted in a response and told you’d never write for them or their company? Might be the lead editor at your dream publisher. It’s a cliche but it’s true: don’t burn any bridges.

7. Respect the editor’s or agent’s time

We know that you’re special and your book is special, but please remember that while we recognize that, we deal with thousands of special authors and books via queries each year. So despite your specialness, we can only allot so much time to each query in order to be fair to other thousands of queries we get. So this is a bit repetitive of some of the earlier ones but in order to respect their time, make sure you follow the submissions guidelines, include what’s requested in those guidelines (and nothing extra), and write the best query letter you can in no more than 4 or 5 short paragraphs (if you even need that much).

The other way you can respect the editor/agent’s time is by following up only after they’ve had the submission for their allotted amount of time. For example, Carina’s auto response and website say response in 8-10 weeks (this is going to be increasing to 10-12 by the way) so please wait until after 10 weeks have elapsed before following up. Please don’t follow up after four weeks or six. Give them the entire amount of time. And during that time, don’t send a bunch of emails with updates about your career, your book or your cat (kidding! I don’t think anyone has ever done that) because you need to trust in your query to sell the book, frequent emails will probably only serve to make the editor/agent believe you don’t respect their time now and wouldn’t respect it if they decided to work with you.

8. Keep the editor/agent updated

Now you’re confused after my last point, right? Don’t be! This is a bit different. Earlier I stated you should mention if your submission is a simultaneous submission. If that submission should happen to be offered a contract or representation, you need to let the people you’ve queried know immediately. So that means do keep track of who you’ve queried and when (spreadsheets are good for this!) and whether you’ve received a response. If you are going to place the book elsewhere, please respect the agent/editor’s time (see how these all tie together?) and send an email pulling the submission. Remember how I said there’s thousands of queries? It’s helpful if we don’t read queries (and manuscripts) that aren’t actually available because we can’t make any money doing that and this is, after all, a business.

However, one caveat to this is if you have a query with multiple editors/agents and you’ve been offered a contract/representation, but you’d like to see if another editor/agent is still interested. It’s permissible to let us know you’ve been offered elsewhere but you’re still interested in working with us, would we be able to or interested in reviewing your query within x number of days/weeks? As one editor said: this can result in a bidding war for your book. Or it can help you land your dream agent. Hey, think positively!

9. Make sure you’re ready to query
But here’s something that might seem to conflict with what I just said (it really doesn’t, though); Please make sure you’re both serious about the person/place you’re querying to, and that you (and your book) are ready to query. Reading each query (and submission) takes both time and money. Each submission to Carina Press costs a minimum of $7.50 (yes, I know the exact minimum cost amount) and that’s just a minimum, the closer it gets to acquisition, the more it costs. Every agency and publisher has their own time and money costs associated with reading submissions and queries, so please make sure you’re serious about wanting to work with whoever you’re querying and not just using it as a lark, to get experience or to throw it out there and see what sticks. Also, don’t send queries for books that aren’t ready. For instance, we’re only interested in complete, fully polished manuscripts. If you’re only 2/3 done writing or haven’t thoroughly edited, don’t send it to an editor or agent unless you know they’re willing to work with new authors on proposal.

10. Use a legible font type and size (and black only please).

For the love of all things holy, please don’t get fancy with your fonts in query letters (and don’t write them in ALL CAPS). First off, realize how much time most editors and agents spend in front of a computer and/or reading manuscripts. 12 hours a day is not an overestimate, more like an underestimate. So please, please, please don’t send us queries done in blue Curlz MT font (my most recent example) because they’re killer on our already strained eyes. And if you’re querying someone who has a page count limit, don’t use 8 pt font to cram as much as possible in. Please (do you see how much I’m pleading here, this is serious stuff, folks!) choose a nice, plain font, in black, with a legible size. Sure, if it’s a digital submission we can change the font/color/size but that means going through extra work and adds time to each query. Even adding an extra two minutes for that type of thing means adding an extra hour of time spent on submissions for every 30 queries. Yeah, funny how quickly it adds up, no? And that means less queries responded to in that hour and the longer you have to wait, especially if we only have an hour per day to look at queries. And realistically, if you make the query hard to read? The editor or agent is going to pass because it’s easier.

11. Realize we want to say yes. But saying no is easier.

I wish I could attribute this to the agent I heard say this at a conference we attended together, but I can’t remember who it was. Essentially, she said that saying “yes” means a lot more work for the editor or agent. If you say yes to the query, you’re then committing to read a partial or a full. And those take a lot of time. So while we hope that every query is amazing, if it’s not amazing in the first few pages, it’s much easier to say no, because your commitment is at an end and it’s one more marked off your list. I think this could be discouraging for authors except for the fact that we really want to say “yes” and if your query is solid, you have a good hook, a unique twist, fantastic writing then you’ve made it impossible for us to say “no” and we’re going to keep going. It’s your job to make it impossible for us to say “no” by sending us the best possible package you can. Easy, right?

12. Do keep in mind that everyone is different (so do do your research!)

So now that I’ve given you this list of do’s and don’ts, which I tried to keep mostly universal and not specific to me, to Carina, or to editors/publishers but to publishing as a whole, I should remind you that each editor and agent are different, we all have different quirks (boy howdy, do we ever) and we realize that can make navigating the submissions process tricky and sometimes frustrating. So do your research, know who you’re submitting to and what they’re looking for, and once you’ve submitted the very best package possible, give yourself a pat on the back. You’ve got a leg up on 90% of the authors out there because you’re researching, learning and worrying about these things.

Good luck!

Tomorrow, a wrap-up on queries, I’ll answer some of the questions you’ve been posing in the comments (if you haven’t asked and still have a question, please do ask!), and I’ll link to some of the other posts on queries that have been written in the past few weeks. I’ll also provide a query letter checklist that you can use as a tool when you’re ready to start querying.

Thinking about query letters. Part I: Query don’ts.

Last week I got a query letter that had me so taken aback, I Twittered about how I wished I could share it. Not to humiliate or ridicule the author in any way, but because I would love to talk about all the reasons it was full of query don’ts, and offer you concrete, real-time examples. In mulling this over, I’ve decided to do a list of query letter don’ts and a list of query letter do’s (list of query do’s to come tomorrow). Since it’s unlikely I can offer a snippet from an actual letter, without making someone feel as though they’ve been made a target, I’ll use paraphrased examples when necessary.

Don’t:

1. Start with a rhetorical question

I see a lot of editors and agents mention this. The reasons are varied, but ultimately it comes down to this: What if the editor or agent’s answer to the question is NO? Is No what you really want them to have in mind when they begin your query?

Example (not real but similar to some I’ve had): Have you ever wondered why time doesn’t run backward? Not only is the answer no, but now I’m wondering why I’d wonder this, and I’m not thinking about the query or concentrating on the details, but I might now be wondering why I’d care why time doesn’t run backward. And perhaps thinking how this sounds like something my five year old would ask. But I’m not thinking about the query.

2. Tell the editor/agent how you know there are submission guidelines but you’re not going to follow them.

Example (paraphrased): I know there are submissions guidelines but I didn’t follow them this time because I’m different.

What do I hear? “I’m more important than you, I’m going to disregard what you suggest when we work together, and clearly I know better than you.” Not only that, but I hear how little respect the author has for me and that it doesn’t matter to them that there are very good reasons I have guidelines. Also? I’m probably hearing the blood rushing in my ears as I get just a little angry.

3. Send a blanket email to every publisher/editor/agent all at once.

You know, as in don’t just throw it out there at everyone and see what sticks. Doing this makes it impossible to personalize the query and tailor it to the person/company you’re sending to, and thus makes your query one of the crowd rather than standing out.

But even worse? When you send it to 50 of us at once and do it in a way that it’s not bcc–we can see every one of the other 49 email addresses you’ve sent it to. It shows, again, a lack of effort and interest in the process.

4. Include details of your family life/personal life/how you’ve wanted to write since you were five.

Tell us only the things that are going to sell your book. Think of us as the first readers you’re trying to sell to. If you were trying to convince a reader to buy your book, would you include a story about how you own five dogs, two cats, a goldfish named Sally? Possibly if your book is a mystery about a petstore owner, but even then…probably not. Because it’s not important information in the marketing of your book to readers, and it’s not important in the querying of your manuscript to editors and agents. It just makes your query letter longer, takes the focus off your book and allows us the opportunity to let our attention wander from your query.

5. Send a query letter that says only: manuscript and synopsis attached.

Not even bothering with a query letter means 1) that I’m going to suspect you’re too lazy to go to the effort of writing even a short query letter and therefore will probably only do the minimum amount of work in response to edits or to market your book and I don’t want to work with an author who’s going to do minimal or no work. 2) That I have to do more work and spend more time figuring out the basics of your query and so you don’t respect that my time is limited and of value. 3) That you really don’t care whether I take a look at your book or not, if you’re not even going to take some basic steps to convince me I should.

Plus? Some editors/agents don’t open attachments. Oops!

6. Address it to “whom it may concern”

On our FAQ page, I give a few suggestions for who you can address the letter to, since authors have no idea which of the editors will be seeing their manuscript. I do this because I know many authors stress over how to address the letter, and while I do like a personalized letter and you should use one as often as possible when sending to specific individuals (for instance, people who read our blog have been addressing their queries to specific editors who said they were looking for a certain genre), there are times when a specific address isn’t possible. However “to whom it may concern” is not even making an effort to personalize it. It’s more of a copy and paste effect. Possibly “Hey you” is the only thing worse. Dear editors or something similar at least lets us know you’re not sending the exact same query letter to every agent, publisher and editor out there. Again, it’s about the effort, however subtle, that we see being put into the query.

7. Send a letter with another publisher’s (editor’s/agent’s) info in the body of the query letter.

Oof. Look, we don’t expect that we’re the sole person or publisher you want to work with, but that doesn’t mean you shouldn’t make us feel as though you’re really interested in working with us and not just whatever editor, agent or publisher you can get to take you or your book.

8. Say that you were recommended by one of our authors, fellow editors or agents without their permission.

No no no no. Don’t be name dropping or saying someone suggested you to us unless you’ve asked permission and are fully prepared for us to follow up and ask that person about you. Just don’t.

9. Query for a genre the person you’re querying doesn’t publish.

Because that’s just silly. Why waste your time? (or theirs?)

10. Forget to include the pertinent information.

I’m always amazed at how verbose query letters can be without imparting information that’s relevant and necessary: title, genre, length, completed or not and a short (short) description of the book. Also, if you have a special affinity for the subject (for example, if you’re an ex-FBI agent and you’re writing a romantic suspense) then that might be considered pertinent info as well. These are the things we want and need to know about the book, not whether your critique partners really loved it!

Also, don’t forget to include your contact information. Real name, address, and phone number so we can contact you, if, you know, we want to publish your book. And include this information on your synopsis and manuscript as well.

11. Address your query to dear agent if it’s going to an editor (and vice versa).

(and don’t tell a publisher/editor that you’re hoping they’ll agree to represent them because we won’t).

12. Don’t send any query, ever, without looking at the submissions/query guidelines for the person or place you’re sending it.

Most of what I said above can be encapsulated down to this: friends don’t let friends send queries without reading the guidelines first!

But since you’re all reading this, I’ll be you already knew this stuff already.

Week 18…The times are changing

First I need to apologize. I had promised a submissions update and there wasn’t one. The honest truth is because I only got through submissions as far as putting them into the spreadsheet and getting them to editors. That might not sound like a lot, but trust me, it was a full day of work plus some. Submissions are very time consuming and I look forward to the day when I have someone who can help me with them, or when I have more time to devote to them (hahaha!).But this does have to be done this week, so you WILL get one this week. As an apology, I’ve worked up two posts on queries that will appear tomorrow and Wednesday. I hope you find them useful.

Second, we are in a big push now as far as our production schedule, in order to meet a June launch with X number of titles and that means my to-do list makes me hyperventilate just a little. This morning, I stared at my computer for a good fifteen minutes while I sorted out my brain and tried to decide what needed to be done first. I hope by the end of the day to be in a place where I don’t feel guilty about having so much needing to be done! But in the meantime, a quick recap for you…

“It’s the cost of being a pioneer.”

This past weekend I attended the Liberty State Fiction Writer’s conference. If you’ve been interested in joining a writer’s group, you might consider this one. It’s for writers of ALL genres of fiction and, even if you’re not close, you can still get benefit from it because they do something totally cool: they podcast all of their meetings. They were also discussing, while I was there, other neat ways of getting info to distance members (videocast, I think?) and that they really want to be all inclusive not just for people in the area, but also for distance members. They have 157 members currently and they’re a combination of published and aspiring authors in a variety of genres. I hope you’ll check them out!

Anyway, an interesting thing happened at that conference. For years, I’ve been attending conferences, doing pitches and sitting on editor panels. The level of interest in me/my company has always varied based on where I am and what conference I’m attending, but when I first started, interest was limited for the most part, because authors wanted to meet the editors from the traditional publishers, pitch to them and ask them questions on the panel. After my first conference, I quickly grew used to this and, if you know me at all, you know I have a very well-developed sense of humor and the ability to not take myself too seriously. I was later telling my workshop attendees about this and the best, and most accurate response came from author Rosemary DiBattista and she said,” That’s the cost of being a pioneer.” It was like a lightbulb, she was so right. I’m a pioneer, wheee! Anyway, over all these years I haven’t been offended by this attitude, it just made me so much more determined to be knowledgeable, grow the business and reputation of digital publishing and educate people because I knew there would come a day when digital publishing would be recognized (you’d better recognize!) So for the past five years, that’s what I’ve done: kept up my knowledge, grown the business of digital publishing (hi, Carina Press!) and worked to educate anyone who wants to listen about digital publishing.

Well, at this particular conference, which wasn’t huge but a nice size of about 130 people, the editor panel was split pretty evenly between those editors from digital-first publishers and those from traditional publishers. And unlike previous years, at previous conferences, the questions were also split if not evenly then actually weighted towards digital publishing. Not just digital-first publishing, but digital publishing in general. No surprise to most of you, I’m sure, but those authors were very interested to hear about digital publishing, digital-first publishing and would the iPad be a game changer? I walked away from that panel realizing that it’s a whole new ballgame now, because authors want to know about my company, and other digital-first publishers, they want to hear what I have to say about digital publishing and many, many authors are paying attention to what they ignored or thought irrelevant 4, 5 and even 2 years ago. It’s a fascinating time to be in publishing, isn’t it?

Cover Art: Parker’s Price by Ann Bruce

Here’s a contemporary romance cover by an artist you haven’t seen on the blog yet for any finalized covers, artist John Kicksee of Kix by Design. Don’t you find yourself longing for the days of summer when you look at this cover? Is it beach season yet?

Photobucket